1. How could such a God pass over into actual creation and become a Creator?
Have we not here an involving of the Absolute God in contingency? 2. Before
creation His activities were entirely inactive, only finding activity in
creation. They were latent, not potent; potential, not actual. Now potentiality
is no substitute for action. It is, relatively to action, deficiency. And if we
say that creation was required to release the Creator from His latency and set
free the quality of Power, with other qualities denoting action, then we have
ascribed to Him deficiency and dependence of the first order.
3. Creation in this case would mean for God the beginning of relations, for
in creating He comes into relations with His world. But the beginning of
relations would mean the beginning of a new kind of life for the Divine Being.
This is against pure transcendence (tanzih).
4. Relation involves something in the way of reaction for both parties. What
is this reaction but passivity? He who hears, for example, has an action done
upon him. This is against tanzih. How could an absolute Being like such a
God limit his absoluteness, and condescend from it?
Now the idea of a Triune God, as revealed through Christ, greatly lessens, if
it does not entirely annul, these great difficulties. Let us note the following
important considerations:
(a) The doctrine of the Triune God reveals to us a God with eternal
activities, not latent, but potent in eternal action. Love is the essence of His
being, |